Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> Kevin Gowen wrote:
>
>> Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>
>>> And if
>>> the US or the world ever become satisfyingly safe,
>>
>> Is such a thing possible?
>
> It's what Bush is spending future generations' money for,

Really?

> as well as
> attacking other nations for.

Really?

> Or was that a lie, too?

What was the first lie?

> It could be that
> Bush will spend just enough money on security, or stir up just enough
> trouble around the world, as before the UN in Iraq, or in sound bites
> on the news, for the US always to be viewed with distrust and
> suspicion by even traditional post WWII allies.

Yes, like the UK.

>>> then people will
>>> remember the economy and deficit, or foreign relations again.
>>
>> That's all that gets talked about now.
>
> No, they are brainwashed into thinking that incarcerating people for
> being Middle Eastern or Muslim for no good reason,

Give me the name of one person who has been incarcerated for no good reason
but simply because they were Middle Eastern/Muslim.

> or attacking other
> nations before they supposedly attack the US, are more important.

Yes. How dare he imitate JFK.

> After Iraq, Americans responded to survey saying they did not want
> further military action.

For the rest of time?

> But if it is in the Administration's agenda
> to fight a war against Iran, Syria, or North Korea, then they will
> find a way to do it,

Yes, administrations generally seek to further their agendas. It's a quirk.

> and justify it as surely as the war against Iraq
> was justified.

At least you concede that the war in Iraq was justified.

-- 
Kevin Gowen