"Disaster" <disaster@disfanfic.net> wrote in message news:<um4al5gg6erob1@corp.supernews.com>...
> "esper41" <esper41@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disaster@disfanfic.net> wrote:
> > > So what? That's totally beside the point and for these matters
> > > unimportant. Obviously we are not talking about Adults, we are talking
> > > about kids. Don't change the subject.
> >
> > Your post implied that you belive adults to be superior to children,
> > and I was merely arguing that that is not always the case - by the
> > same token, if you look hard enough you will find an 8-year-old
> > smarter than you and me put together.
> 
> Superior is not the right term. We are all equal as humans go. However an
> adult will always be smarter then a child, more experienced and so forth.
> Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure this rule has it's exception. For example
> someone who has abused alcohol for years and as a result has suffer
> several strokes will most likely have a severally reduce mental capacity.
> 
> But don't sit there an suggest that I have implied something I have not!
> Your use of the term superior is an ugly attempt to twist my words into
> something that looks like unjustified bias.
> 
> No 8 year old has the life experience of myself, let alone you and me put
> together. There is no point in having huge intelligence if you don't know
> how or why to use it.

I'm sorry if I misinterpreted your post, and I certainly didn't mean
to offend you as much as I seem to have done - perhaps we should just
agree to disagree on this, I don't want to makean enemy of you.