revereatmy@ngelicqualities.evilsatan (Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in message news:<GOD9461C03F9700Cgotochurch@mass-at-11am-every-Sunday.orgy>...
> The Lord alerted my mind to the presence of this EVIL article by Elf
> Snowmega, and I thusly replied: 
> 
> > 2501 news:10e60fcf.0312290606.6a1abf43@posting.google.com
>  
> >> 5parrow
> >> the eternal lost lurker
> >> KaraOhki
> >> Ken Arromdee
> >> Gerardo Campos
> >> Tolaris
> >> Robert Hutchinson
> >> Scott de La Hunt
> >> Gramarye
> >> Pook!
> >> Serena Wakefield
> >> David Johnston
> >> Fish Eye no Miko
> >> whoever douglASS
> >> Adrian Martin
> >> KEVIN TRAINOR FATHER (the ass)
> >> and
> >> kevin trainor junior (the hole)
> >>
> >> }
> > 
> > Good list!
> 
> Why am I not on this list?

quantium Physics and beyond                                           
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                        I

                          

 

Quantium bomb
   A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions
around us and is a infinite chain reaction every opposing reaction has
an unseen opposite reaction ( refraction )of light. Wave Length -
Gravity -
Light - mass - Wave Lengths.( THEY ARE ALL INTERCHANGEABLE )"

Over the past century, physicists have unlocked the secrets behind
radio and television, nuclear energy and the power of the sun. Now
they're seeking the ultimate prize: a "theory of everything" that
could reveal a bizarre realm of inter dimensional wormholes and time
warps.

SUCH A THEORY would give us the ability to "read the mind of God,"
says Cambridge cosmologist Stephen Hawking. And in Hawking's opinion,
there's a 50-50 chance that someone will discover the Holy Grail of
physics within the next 20 years.

Beginning in the 1920s, a generation of scientists defined the
small scale universe as a collection of fuzzy phantoms. These
subatomic particles couldn't be precisely located in space and time,
but their interaction could be described in statistical terms.The
equations that describe the gravitational field are completely
different from those for electromagnetism and subatomic interactions.

But one bizarre approach is gaining popularity. It turns out that the
equations of quantum theory can mesh perfectly with the theory of
relativity. Now in the 2003 we know the quantum address of all matter
in
our quantum tunnel.

This article is based on material from "Hyper space" and "Visions" by
Michio Kaku. 12-01-03

 

-------------------------------------------------------

   He apparently emailed this to Art bell and Art read it on the air
to Kaku
last night and Kaku said it was stupid.  "That doesn't make any
sense," he said; when Art pressed him further, Kaku said "It's in
defiance of the laws of physics." 

I was actually quite impressed by Kaku on last night's show.  When he
sticks to actual physics and the history of same, he seems quite
intelligent.  He had some interesting things to say about nuclear
reactor accidents and how they happened.  
Art Bell 

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ 10-15-2003

-------but-------------------but------------------but-------------------------

    According to the physicists in the USA and Austria who have come
up with a new, improved
solution to this dastardly challenge of probing without interacting,
the answer is 'yes'. The 'superbomb' conundrum
above was posed in 1993, by physicists A. Elitzur and L. Vaidman, to
illustrate the problem of 'interaction-free'
measurements. It is a restatement of the old quantum-theory chestnut:
the observer and the observed are inextricably
linked. Elitzur and Vaidman proposed that, far from foiling attempts
at interaction-free measurement, quantum theory
makes them possible. Conventional thinking says that, if you want to
inspect the bombs, there's no option but to
bounce at least one photon off them. Yet according to quantum theory,
because light is both wave and particle,
a photon can have a ghostly influence on itself. A beam of light that
is split in two and then recombined by a system
of mirrors will generate interference effects - even if only one
photon passes through the apparatus at a time. Elitzur
and Vaidman showed that, because of this 'self-interference', a primed
superbomb could be detected with a one in two chance
even without the photon actually striking it. This is all very well as
far as it goes - but the option of being blown
up in half of the measurements is none too attractive. Now Paul Kwiat
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in
New Mexico, and colleagues, have improved the odds from one in two to
almost one in four. As they explain in Physical
Review Letters(1) they have improved on Elitzur and Vaidman's
solution, with the help of another strange quantum-mechanical
effect: the 'quantum Zeno effect'. This trick is named after Zeno, the
Greek philosopher of the fourth century BC renowned
for his relish of paradoxes. His take on the 'measurement problem' has
entered folklore as the adage that 'a watched
pot never boils'. In the quantum world, this can acquire some truth:
in some situations, repeated measurements made
on a quantum system can prevent it from changing its state. This is
the quantum Zeno effect. It operates even if the
interaction between the probe and the system is extremely weak. The
interaction can then be inferred from the
invariance of the system. The effect holds even in the case of
vanishingly small interaction strengths, if the
measurements are made often enough. Now, Kwiat and colleagues report
that, with just six such measurements,
a single photon of laser light could detect a particular quantum
system two times out of three without being
absorbed. By combining Elitzur and Vaidman's beam-splitting
arrangement with an arrangement of polarizing filters to
bring about the quantum Zeno effect, the researchers figured that they
could, in principle, make interaction-free
measurements as reliably as they liked. In practice, the limited
number of repeat measurements in their set-up gave
them a hypothetical probability of interaction-free detection of 85
per cent. Experimentally, the efficiency
was a little less - about 74 per cent, or three out of four - because
of losses in the light signal within the apparatus.
But the researchers claim that increasing the number of sequential
measurements to 100 would increase
the practical efficiency to more than 93 per cent. So there is hope
yet for the quantum detective.

(1) References Kwiat, P. G., White, A. G., Mitchell,
J. R., Nairz, O., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A.
High-Efficiency Quantum Interrogation Measurements via
the Quantum Zeno Effect Physical Review Letters 83,
4725 - 4728 1999.| Homepage: http://prl.aps.org/ |


Post a follow-up to this message


 


Advance Technology


    Mark and x advance technology then bring it back in time to the x
give it to the researchers and then go to the future and do the same
thing  


Advance technology beyond area 51
   Build a quantum lab and mark off area X develop future theory 
technology give it a project number and pass it on and on so in the
future we can quantum leap
technology back in time. two lab area x. build a quantum reinstatement
area. fiber optic cable on a super computer..


 64 bit processor run like 100 million zeta hz
    Data encryption 360 degrees rotation document 90 degrees and
encryption on every angel then change it two binary code and fold it
over like a
piece of paper then having the one's and zero cancel each other out.
if you written a very long letter and then change it two binary code
it would look like this.

01010101010101010101010
10010101010101010101010
01010101001010101010010
00010101000101010101010
                                               10010101010100101010101
            would equal       =  01
01010101010100001100101
01001010101010101010111
11110111001101010101010
01010101010101010101010
10101010101010101010101

If you took the piece of paper and folded it and folded it and folded
it the 0 and 1 would cancel each out and if you keep folding the piece
of paper too the smallest you would have 4 numbers left if 1+1 =
nothing and 0 + 0 = nothing 1+0=1 and 0+1+0 01 now if the key new the 
folding times you could send 2 bytes over the internet and unzip a 100
zetabyte program you computer could store all the programs ever
written but just need the key to unzip then you could us this for SETI
for signals or can you imagine a computer processor that would be 1.8
Hz but run like 100 million zeta hz you could use the new 64 bit
process second side to unzip while the front side processes. or use
this for the matrix or quantum computing or supercomputer. 64 bit. 1+1
= nothing and 0 + 0 = nothing 1+0=1 and 0+1+0  dont forrget to use <
and > signes 0>1+1<0. You could use this transmite a signal to space
that would never be decrypted or encryted to space.


If numbers go on too the end of time then that states there are
infinit

solutions to infinit problems and infinit problems to infint solutions
so maybe one day we will find it in time.

"Infint Ideas"



Parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299

thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is
the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun
the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions and its 8 and 4 for rtd2
so i invented this for a message to get back thaks penatagon!!!!!!!

www.speedypc.20m.com


                               4
                    32         |
                               |
                           128 |
              8----------------|

this is the formula for time travel and how to build a hypergate!!

alt.devilbunnies
alt.fan sailor moon

Just think if you could take any person on this earth in any demention
and find out what they new anytime in space time
is that why they say the are more powerful than 3 black holes.
we are more powerful than 6 ( yes 6 on the top of the page )