http://mypeoplepc.com/members/jon8338/math/id18.html

This goes to show that a point described by two different coordinate systems 
is still the same point.  When that point becomes a surface undergoing 
motions into an EVENT, then that EVENT described by two different coordinate 
systems is still the same event.

Why make the distinction?

Apparently the obvious needs to be proven.

The goat swallowed the shirt, the shirt was offended and turned the goat 
inside-out so the goat was wearing the shirt, as a shirt was intended.

But consider TWO DIFFERENT EVENTS described by ONE coordinate system.  Then 
associated with every motion of one event is a motion of the second event, 
WHETHER BY CAUSE AND EFFECT OR NOT.  The equations describing this 
relationship (and there are many of them), formulate and precipitate 
synchronous PROBABILITIES; that is,

The drunk abused his wife with mental anguish.  She died of cirrhosis of the 
liver and he died of a brain tumor.  They SWAPPED illnesses they SHOULD have 
gotten.  In this case they INVERTED their illnesses.

Did you know that while a carpenter was hammering nails in Dallas, a woman 
in New England was having a pounding headach?  There is NO RELATIONSHIP.  It 
is COINCIDENCE.  Yet associated with the hammering is the pounding.  In this 
case there is a ONE to ONE coincidence with a PROBABILITY FOR CAUSE AND 
EFFECT of zero.

The possibilities for associating events with each other are exponential, or 
infinite.

When you are walking on the sidewalk, don't step on a crack or you'll break 
your mother's back.  There is no scientific basis for this, and it doesn't 
happen.  There may, however, be many hidden scientific laws behind apparent 
coincidences.

If you visit my web site you'll have to know math to understand it.  In 
layman's terms it only means that you can look at house from the East or 
look at a house from the West, but it's still the SAME HOUSE.  Whenever it's 
NOT, it is a scientifically unacceptable situation.

-- 
Jon G.
jon8338@peoplepc.com