Path: news.ccsf.jp!news.heimat.gr.jp!news.snarked.org!feeder.erje.net!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.254.MISMATCH!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe01.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: "john" <chris1234@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: fj.kanji,comp.sys.atari.8bit,comp.sys.cbm
References: <65e29e44-0b67-44ac-b75e-39719f578324@c9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <gs5l76$elv$1@news.motzarella.org>
In-Reply-To: <gs5l76$elv$1@news.motzarella.org>
Subject: Re: The C64 is much better than the ATARI 800!!!
Lines: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
Message-ID: <XFlGl.62023$ga.59323@newsfe01.ams2>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.1.169.114
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: newsfe01.ams2 1240065783 82.1.169.114 (Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:43:03 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:43:03 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:42:59 +0100
Xref: news.ccsf.jp fj.kanji:1363

Considering the 800 was around 5 years before the C64....

Graphically I'd say it's better than the C64 is some areas...