"Seefor" <invalid@email.address> wrote in message
news:i3Fwe.59033$G8.27626@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Ron Mexico" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:MpqdnWTHu_UYZF_fRVn-jg@comcast.com...
> >
> > "GMAN" <glenzabr@xmission.com> wrote in message
> > news:d9uq14$ii$2@news.xmission.com...
> >> In article <Abywe.58659$G8.28585@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Seefor"
> >> <invalid@email.address> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>> The bigger they are the harder they fall. Sony's time at the top will
> >>>> have
> >>>> end at some point (maybe not even this generation) I just hope they
> >>>> haven't invested so much money that it brings down their TV empire as
> >>>> well.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>It starts:
> >>>
> >>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4632931.stm
> >>>
> >>>
> >> All that shows is that the demand for old style CRT's have fallen in
> >> favor of
> >> LCD, DLP, and plasma technologies. How in the hell does this have
> >> anything to
> >> do with the PS3 or Sony's solvency?
> >
> > I was wondering the same thing.  Maybe if he had pointed to the link
about
> > Sony dropping out of the plasma production loop in favor of LCD that
would
> > have been a little closer to being relevant even though it is only a
> > rumor.
> >
>
> Either way Playstation will fade and die.  I am right, and will be proven
> right.

awe.... aint it cute?
a new troll