"Boody Bandit" <boodybandit@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:0dCdnfp-i9l4Iy3fRVn-tg@suscom.com...
>
> "Fik" <fiknospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:nK1se.28653$n_6.11334@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "Doug Jacobs" <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote in message 
>> news:11b0q8frndkjs6d@corp.supernews.com...
>>> In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Xen0s* <Xen0s@ba.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> however if ps3 will use the hardware chipset ot play ps2 games, ps3 
>>>> will be
>>>> definitively unable to play this games in higher resolution and/or with
>>>> FSAA, additional filtering and so on..
>>>
>>> Probably not, but Sony is going for compatibility.  I'd much rather have
>>> something capable of playing my entire PS2 library, over something that
>>> only supports a few titles really well, but nothing else.
>>>
>>
>> Surely you already have something capable of playing your PS2 library - 
>> presumably a PS2 - that does a reasoble job of it ! ;-)
>
> Most people don't like clutter

Most gamers do - to a level - many will have Xbox - PS2 - GC at least all 
under their TV with DVD players and all the other stuff.

Below my TV I have Xbox - GC - Satellite Box - DVD Player and scart 
switcher. I'd love to have less clutter but I already have a space reserved 
for the 360. If you do the cabling right then it can look very tidy.

>
>