Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!norn-news!news.mcu.or.jp!navi.honnet.co.jp!news.gw.fukushima-u.ac.jp!honnetnews!news.northeye.org!gcd.org!leaf.gcd.org!news.unit0.net!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!213.239.142.2.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!63.218.45.11.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail From: francois.grieu@spirtech.com Message-ID: Newsgroups: sci.crypt,japan.test Subject: @@@@@ lots of filthy exits apologise Tommy, and they not stamp Gul too @@@@@ Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:57:52 GMT Organization: it should feature revolutionary operas v the watery funny stairs, whilst Laura yet experiences them too Lines: 45 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org japan.test:1849 communications). It is these sets of words and numbers (and combinations of them), under a particular category, that are placed in the Dictionary computers. The whole system was developed by the NSA. P51- The only known public reference to the ECHELON system was made in relation to the Menwith Hill station. In July 1988, a United States newspaper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, published a story about electronic monitoring of phone calls of a Republican senator, Strom Thurmond. The alleged monitoring occurred at Menwith Hill. Margaret Newsham worked at Menwith Hill as a contract employee of Lockheed Space and Missiles Corporation. She is said to have told congress staff that, while at Menwith, she was able to listen through earphones to telephone calls being monitored. When investigators subpoenaed witnesses and sought access to plans and manuals for the ECHELON system, they found there were no formal controls over who could be targeted; junior staff were able to feed in target names to be searched for by the computers without any check of their authorization to do so. None of this is surprising and it is likely to be insignificant compared with official abuse of the system. The capabilities of the ECHELON system are so great, and the secrecy surrounding it makes it so impervious to democratic oversite, that the temptation to use it for questionable projects seems irresistible. In June 1992 a group of current 'highly placed intelligence operatives' from the British GCHQ spoke to the paper Observer: 'We feel we can no longer remain silent regarding that which we regard to be gross malpractice and negligence within the establishment in which we operate.' They gave as examples GCHQ interception of three charitable organizations, including Amnesty International and Christian Aid. As the Observer reported: "At any ti