Re: Why are white people so ridiculously superior?
In article <1130120245.750948.190930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
richasiankid@hotmail.com says...
> Vernon North wrote:
> > In article <1130035777.399444.145860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > richasiankid@hotmail.com says...
> > > You just don't understand the psychology of liberalism.
> > >
> > OK, what IS "liberalism" and what is its psychology?
> >
> > Verno
>
>
> http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3020
>
> "My basic proposal, then, is that most (but not all) Leftists/liberals
> are motivated by strong ego needs - needs for power, attention,
> praise and fame. And in the USA and other developed countries they
> satisfy this need by advocating large changes in the society around
> them - thus drawing attention to themselves and hopefully causing
> themselves to be seen as wise, innovative, caring etc. Rightists by
> contrast have no need either for change or its opposite and may oppose
> change if they see it as destructive or favour change if they see it as
> constructive."
>
> "The appeal of Leftism to the average person is simple: The Leftist
> offers something for nothing. And that is always hard to resist -
> fraudulent though it usually is. If the Leftist offers to redistribute
> somebody else's wealth into your pocket, that is one hell of an
> appealling scam to those who stand to benefit from it."
>
> "The undoubted fact that Left activists and agitators (from the
> Bolsheviks on) tend to come from affluent families does not to me point
> to guilt as their motive at all. Rather the "limousine liberal"
> phenomenon shows me that those who have all that they want materially
> then seek other luxuries: such as self-righteousness, praise, power and
> excitement - particularly the excitement of being demonstrators in
> the case of "rich kid" Leftists. And if the young limousine liberal can
> have praise and self-righteousness along with his/her excitement what a
> good deal it is! It is much the same motivation that causes self-made
> rich men (such as Bill Gates) to become highly philanthropic. Bill
> Gates has power and wealth so he now seeks praise and righteousness."
>
>
> ----
> I can easily be that 'rich kid' of course - actually they're often only
> middle class with family incomes <$200k. I just think that the other
> side can be valid too though.
>
> Think of it as my unique form of charity - i.e. championing for the
> masses at the expense of my self-interest. When I feel like it. :)
>
> Don't forget to read those paragraphs on religion too. AGain, wow, he
> spoke my mind.
>
> In any case, this guy has a nice website. Everyone, check out these
> pics before reading the above essay!
> http://geocities.com/jonjayray/
It looks to me that by Ray's definition, there are few of them around.
Ray himself says:
"MOST ORDINARY PEOPLE do not fit very neatly into any political category
and may hold to a mix of views that include what would usually be seen
as both Leftist and Rightist ideas."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1226
It looks to me as though a lot is lost in this debate by reducing
"leftists" to . . . . surprise . . . . a stereotype.
Verno
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735