In article <1109631441.040499.208810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, 
superoutland@aol.com says...
> >if your statements makes ANY sense at all, I'm sure you'll post
> >explaining it.
> 
> >i'm waiting . . . .
> 
> 
> 
> This is what as known as a hasty generalization.  

No, your post is what's known as a non-sequitur.  And your quote of my 
post above is what's known as a forgery. It contains elementary spelling 
and grammatical errors that were not in the original.

> You can not say
> nothing I say makes since simply because you do not understand
> something I explained.

You explained nothing.  In addition, your sentence above is a semantic 
mess.

> Your post is thus a fallacy in it's entirity
> and can be accorded no weight
> 
Duck, dodge, obfuscate, and show off the low quality of your written 
English.

Your original post was wrong.  You're trying to hide it by snipping your 
mistakes and changing the subject.  The Japanese did NOT attack Pearl 
Harbour because the US had imprisoned Japanese Americans, as you claimed 
earlier.  There was no mass internment of Japanese Americans until 
several months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour.

Verno