On Jun 9, 8:30 pm, witchdoctorwithdogma
<witchdoctorwithdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As to  Maki Fukawawa's "Japanese 'Herbivor Men'" column:http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/06/05/japan.herbivore.men/index..."_leftside"
>
> or use this:http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/06/05/japan.herbivore.men/index...
>
> I have argued the following (found at the "SOCIOBIOLOGIC APOPTOSIS"
> page of my website, which must be entered through its description /
> disclaimer page.)
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
>
> RELIGION, IN  ITS EFFORT TO INCREASE POPULATION AND LIKELY LATER, BUT
> POSSIBLY ORIGINALLY AS WELL, TO CREATE AN OBJECT OF INQUISITION AND
> THUS TO CREATE GROUPS OF THE DEMONIZED WITH WHICH TO ASSOCIATE
> POLITICAL ENEMIES, INADVERTENTLY CAUSED THE PROPAGATION OF
> HOMOSEXUALITY SUCH THAT IT INCREASINGLY HAS OCCURED AT A RATE FAR
> HIGHER THAN THE INCIDENCE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE NATURALLY OCCURED.
>
> THE MAIN CONSEQUENCE, ULTIMATELY, IS / WILL BE THE LACK OF SUFFICIENT
> HETEROSEXUALITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ANY PARTICULAR NATION'S RECENT
> PAST, HIGHER POPULATION LEVELS.
>
> I argue why Japan's projected population decline is unrelated to this,
> whereas Russia's, for instance, indeed is.
>
> Maki Fukawawa's column is contrary and interesting, but I've seen this
> before: imitation of one culture's style, obviously, an many places
> worldwide,  in recent times thanks to the world's being totally
> connected.
>
> Japan raises the question of an endemic tendency toward imitation
> however:
>
> Instances of apparent imitativeness abound, and I won't mention them
> so as to avoid
> unnecessary stereotyping.   What I might offer that's new is it has
> distinct anti-Semitic elements despite never having had direct
> experience with the Jewish community whatsoever.
>
> I personally don't think a genetic imitativeness actually exists, but
> I also don't believe any genuine basis for saying Japanese men are
> less manly today than in the past can exist, for the influences that
> have caused Western nations to have far more homosexuality than
> Eastern ones have not had enough time to have had an impact on even
> current Japanese generations.  That being the case, I'm perplexed as
> to what the basis would be.
>
> But, does Maki Fukasawa like the idea of publicly judging men by their
> degrees of manliness as have many women in the West?  (I of course can
> not know.)  Have many men lately been going around Japan judging
> women, or for that matter, Maki Fukasawa, as to their / her
> femininity?
>
> The scientific speculation underlying my site, and actually about 75%
> of which I expect to be ultimately born out by academicsin population
> and genetics is the following.
>
> In "A Painful Discovery," Carren Strock ("Newsweek" columnist) said
> most lesbians are ultra ultra late in self-awareness.
>
> (LINK )Study: 40 percent of women report having sexual problems, but
> most aren't bothered by them, according to the largest study ever
> published on a women's sexual health.
>
> KPBS-TV (San Diego's Public Television Station:) "Mexico," 2000:
> At the shows outset, an interviewed Mexican fellow responds to why
> he has lots of children, "I have as many as possible to prove my
> masculinity."
>
> "20-20," 2000, ABC-News, "marriage counselors have seen a sudden
> influx of middle aged
> married women with children complaining of "lacking something," "not
> knowing
> what it is," and ultimately accepting that they don't want to go
> further without accepting that they in fact are lesbians.
>
> Rostler/Mundell "Homosexual Sex Exploding With US Women-15 Fold
> Increase in 10 Years," Journal of Sex Research," 2001 37: 333-343
> VERIFIES MENDELIAN 3:1 LESBIAN TO GAY MALE RATIO.
>
> A national survey has found the percentage of US women who say they
> recently had gay sex has increased 15-fold from 1988 to 1998 SOURCE:
> Journal of Sex Research 2001;37:333-343
>
> CBS News: 1/16/2007:"51% OF WOMEN SINGLE IN 1976" "Women like 29-year-
> old XXXXXXX XXXXX of New York. "We don't need men anymore," she says.
> "I mean, we want men, we want someone to share everything with, but I
> don't think we need to rush."
>
> And in downtown Los Angeles, XXXXXXX says, "I want to get married so I
> can have kids, make my Mom happy, my Dad too."
>
> MANY DOUBLE X'S, SUCH AS BRCA1 AND BRCA2, HAVE RECENTLY BEEN FOUND
> TO NOT CANCEL OUT.
>
> Encourage lesbians to marry heterosexually, their husbands over-
> producing out of the fear of being wrongly ferreted out as gay; or,
> encourage their marrying each other--which do you prefer?
>
> And as the gay gene found by the NIH in 1993, responsible for most
> homosexuality (except for 1 in 7 men gay developmentally--University
> of Toronto,) ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY, AS DOES 2d one (all below,) and
> as the Rostler-Mundell study verifies, the first choice yields the
> production of gays in a ratio of nearly 3 lesbians per gay male.
>
> "(Natl. Instit. of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93,
> on page 1:)
>  NO WONDER psychiatrists considered man-hating mother the prime cause
> of male homosexuality until discovered:
>
> WOMEN CAN GET ONE OR TWO COPIES (Xq28 IS ON THE FEMALE CHROMOSOME. MEN
> CAN ONLY GET ONE COPY. WOMEN ARE 3 X LIKELIER TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE.
> DOUBLE X's RECENTLY FOUND IN MANY GENES TO NOT CANCEL OUT. Hamer's
> discovery first covered in "Science," 7/16/93, and "N.Y. Times",
> 7/16/93, on page 1, by Natalie Angier:
> "THE LATEST RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE NEWLY REPORTED GENETIC FACTOR IS
> PASSED THROUGH THE MATERNAL LINE, A CURIOUS TWIST GIVEN THAT IN THE
> PAST PSYCHIATRY HAS HELD WOMEN AT LEAST PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR
> FOSTERING THEIR SONS' HOMOSEXUALITY." THE GENE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95% OF
> GAYS ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY.
>
> The inquisition against the gays was to makes straight people afraid
> of being wrongly ferreted out as gay for an increase in population and
> male insecurities and thus inadequacies. This enabled ancient despots
> to rumble, and it allowed the creation of a slave class.
>
> (link:)THE FACT OF HAVING OLDER BROTHERS STATISTICALLY AFFECTS 14%
> OF GAY MALES (UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO--STUDY "NOT DETERMIN(ing) A CAUSE
> OF THE CORRELATION
>
> (link:)ALSO, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO RESEARCHERS FIND LEFT-HANDEDNESS IS
> CORRELATED WITH HOMOSEXUALITY
>
> U.C. Berkeley's Breedlove discovers (later imitated at
> Northwestern, reported on by
> Leslie Stahl,) 3/30/2000, discovers later born males have increased
> likelihood to be gay,
> and he adds that it appears to be a statistical result reflecting
> another influencing factor.
>
> THAT FACTOR IS DISCOVERED:
>
> (link:)We have finally solved (gay pop. sustaqinability) this paradox,
> says Andrea Camperio-Ciani of the University of Padua. The same factor
> that influences sexual orientation in males promotes higher fecundity
> in females.
>
> The inquisition against the gays more readily induces lesbians to
> marry heterosexually. The gay gene only passes maternally.
>
> Lesbians who do have children are genetically inclined to have MANY
> children.
>
>  AND THEIR HUSBANDS ARE PRECISELY THE ONES, MARRIED TO LESBIANS,
> PRODUCTS OF RELIGION, GIVEN TO MAKING STRAIGHT GUYS AFRAID OF BEING
> WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY, WHO WILL OVER-PRODUCE CHILDREN TO AVOID
> BEING WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY, ALL THE WHILE THEIR WIVES CARRYING
> THE GAY GENE.
>
> This assures statistically that later-born sons will be born gay
> (likelier coming from a woman who has more children, it now shown that
> lesbians produce more children.) AND: (My comment:) statististically
> inevitable where lesbians are encouraged to marry heterosexually.
>
> Rostler/Mundell "Homosexual Sex Exploding With US Women-15 Fold
> Increase in 10 Years--"JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH," 2001 37: 333-343
>
> DEMONIZE AND ASSOCIATE YOUR FOES WITH THE DEMONIZED.  EXACTLY LIKE
> CALLING LIBERALS COMMUNISTS, HAVE SOME TWIT CALL A POLITICAL CANDIDATE
> GAY (ACTUAL EXAMPLES ELSEWHERE IN THE SITE.) THAT AND POPULATION
> GROWTH ALLOWED ANCIENT, AND MODERN DESPOTS TO RUMBLE.
>
> sites.google.com/site/holychangeshttp://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
>
> <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/
> holychanges"TARGET="_leftside">TO OPEN THE SOURCE
>    WEBSITE IN ANOTHER WINDO</a>
>
> Or, to open it in another window, this may suffice:
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges"TARGET="_leftside"

ADDING:

AS TO IMITATIVENESS:

the copies of the Eiffel Tower and Statue of Liberty; more as well,
but
 unnecessary particularly when they border on stereotyping