Path: news.ccsf.jp!shiino.jp!mmcatv.co.jp!jpix!newsfeed2.kddnet.ad.jp!newsfeed2.kddnet.ad.jp!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: niccurrediap@gmail.com Newsgroups: fj.soc.copyright Subject: Robbery can Be a Happy Ending if the Victim Own a Gun Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:41:35 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 100 Message-ID: <924fdaf1-c4aa-4514-ac29-464a23060d37@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.137.19.221 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1196592095 20251 127.0.0.1 (2 Dec 2007 10:41:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 10:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.137.19.221; posting-account=AM5kywkAAABRqPKhT_ks842uEkIx6B0y User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Content-Disposition: inline X-Original-Bytes: 5987 Xref: news.ccsf.jp fj.soc.copyright:449 Renato Hughes and his two pal entered a house. Some says that he allegedly broke into the house. Then, they beat up the step son of Shannon Edmonds. Then the robbers successfully brought a lot of cash after raping some hot chicks and get away with it with the public blaming the victim as usual. After all, who knows that the victim may have done something wrong. Maybe the victim look at the wrong direction and hence provoke the just robber to slaughter victims. Well, that's what usually happens. Not this time though. Shannon Edmonds shot the 2 kids in the back when they're fleeing. In rare surprising case, the DA did what seems to be the right thing. The DA charged Renato Hughes, the robber, with murder. When some vermin choose to rob people's house, it's naturally liable for all the risk that happen because of the robbery. Edmond didn't choose to get rob. The robber chose to rob him. For once, it's kind of cool that even a government can figure out that it's the robber's fault. Not porn movie fault. Not the media. Not Hollywood. Not video games. When people rob, killing robbers would help putting robbers population under control. Hell, even government got things right once in a while when the good guys show them who's tough. In many countries, religious thugs can come from house to house violating the owners' right to (even legally) watch porn and sell liquor. In UK, we got good guys go to jail just for defending the little right he still have from two vermins that want to rob him. In US no... Thanks to people like Edmon. This is really a country of the (relatively) brave. If we have more people like Edmon, it'll be even braver. When thieves victim die and die, people would expect that it's okay to steal. That perhaps the productive should share more money to robbers. They would think that it's moral to steal. However, people like Edmonds reverse this trend. With more brave people like Edmon, one day, it'll be legal to pursue thieves and slaughter their whole family if that's what it takes to retrieve stolen properties when thieves fail to honor property right by returning stolen properties. It'll be a positive feedback. There will be less thieves. That means less vote for thieves' right and more vote for property right. More and more self defense will be legal. Then, there will be less thieves. Then properties will be saver. Sweet.... That's what should happen to all robbers. That's what all productive people should do in this world when it's legal: Kill vermins and parasites that get on their way, like Edmond. Vermins want to play tough, we should play tougher. Promote death penalty. Kill burglars, and robbers, protect properties. The more we kill them the saver our property, which is the sole purpose why we need government, killing thieves and robbers to protect our property. Please consult your lawyers about your right to kill vermins... Killing vermins illegally can be very politically costly. Keeping it legal will cut down political cost. The lesser the cost, the more we can buy. Also not simply because it's just means it's legal. There are idiot DA and cops in the world that would give problems to self defender even on clear cut case. However, working too hard to keep it legal, like waiting till they hit or shoot first, can get you killed, which is a very high cost. So do it legally. I don't want to cause good people to go to jail (or die) for the only important social value the world need, protection of properties and killing vermins that get in the way of that. Fuck eradicating poverty, environmentalist, public school. There is only one social value worthy for everyone and that's killing vermins to protect the wealth of the productive. The market will take care the rest. Believing otherwise means practicing envy bigotry. When government ain't doin that, the world is already gun zone. What do you think? Hopefully more vermins die that way. Kudo for Shannon Edmonds. Way to go. That's model citizen. That's how life work. That's the way things work as there are still people opposing free market, kill or be killed. Edmond do the right thing, he choose not to be killed. Hip hip huraaaaaahhhh... NB: As of this writing there is a doubt whether this is a real robbery or just some drug deals gone bad. The home owners deal drugs (a crime as victimless as killing vermins). However, the shot robbers have robbery convictions. Also they never denied of beating up Edmon's step son to the point of causing brain damage. If mistakes are made to prosecute the surviving robber, it's most likely not a big one. Some of the activities that described here may not be legal. Please consult your lawyer before killing anyone (long before any possible encounter, of course).