Psaiyan Prince Vegeta <ppvegeta@hotmail.communism> was incriminated by
their posting [Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:46:12 GMT] to
uk.media.animation.anime:

>On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:29:55 GMT, Blade <kumonryuu@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>An [H] tag would do nicely.  The selfsame poster was asked to and 
>>complied with using it on AFD.  Perhaps, if asked, he would have the same 
>>courtesy again.  PPV?
>
>I don't have a problem with using an [H] tag if that is what is asked
>of me by the group. Still, it seems a little redundant when these
>topics are generally originated from others (our old friend
>goat@goat.goat especially) whom I doubt will be interested in
>following any such decorum...

It's thread-drift that's the problem. I regularly mark such threads as
kill/ignore, and then the next time someone changes the topic it comes
back with a vengeance.

At least tagging H-threads as [H] will mean that anyone with killfiles
can at least be sure that  great deal of these can be auto-killed.
After all, if someone follows-up adding an [H] tag, it's almost
certian that any replies to that particular post will still carry it.

Similarly, I guess, it's a useful tag to add if you want to add an
H-slant to an existing thread. At least there'll be some kind of
warning that things have taken a slight... turn.

Tiggs
-- 
Tiggs Panther   =^.^=
"I think I might have been normal once."