On May 5, 8:11�pm, "Rita B. Flesh" <vintage_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Shakespeare was no man, she was a woman in disguise.
>
> A genius like her could not be a man, because men are
> stupid, they do think with their cocks.
>
> We should rewrite history books and tell everybody that
> Shakespeare was a WOMAN!!!

MM:
It is true that lust is very powerful.  In India one past mystic said,
"I tremble at the sight of an old woman of ninety."  Kabir Sahib said,
"If you embrace a strange woman, you might have to suffer for 1000
years."

Mystics, however, have gone to regions beyond lust.  They are attached
to higher planes.  They will not be reborn here because of sex organs,
that's for sure.  They might be sent as a saviour, by God, but that is
a different story.  Shakespeare was carrying out the duties of the
Supreme Being, and he was a MAN.  YAY!  LOL

Michael Martin