Phil Da Lick! wrote:
> massivegrooves wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>>
>>> Boody Bandit wrote:
>>>
>>>> "massivegrooves" <massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:428D1559.9050304@massivegrooves.net...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> RnR Lesnar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm pretty impressed by the new Zelda game.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RnR Lesnar
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The new Zelda game had been shown, or shown to some degree already. It
>>>>> is a decent looking game, MUCH better looking than Wind Breaker ;)
>>>>> It looks as though Nintendo had nothing...pretty poor showing for them
>>>>> at the biggest event of the year.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe there is zero voice acting in the game.
>>>> I also can't believe that I can't believe there is no voice acting 
>>>> in the
>>>> game.
>>>> This is why I am so hard on Nintendo, they simply don't get it.
>>>> Did you hear Miyamoto's comments on the 360 and PS3?
>>>> They are headed in a different direction (technology) while we are 
>>>> going
>>>> after a different audience.
>>>>
>>>> WTF is this guy smoking?
>>>> Most of us grew up playing their titles.
>>>> Hey get this Miya, we are not kids anymore!!!!!
>>>> Why aren't you making games for us?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> why the hell would you want voice acting in a zelda title?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Because this is 2005 ;) Just seems kinda weak not to have it in this 
>> day and age, in the past it was somewhat understandable.
>>
> 
> better to leave it out altogether than have weak voice acting, and it 
> doesnt really fit the genre.

It fits the genre fine, it is more that Nintendo is still about 10 years 
behind the times ;)