necoandjeff wrote:

> > Which is precisely what is wrong with law enforcement and the legal
> system.
>
> And you would fix it how?

Just like with the last guy a few weeks ago, I am going to request you
consult Google and four years of posts, to find out about what Mike Cash
has been so kind to dub "EricWorld" to save everybody time because it will
always be the same.

Basically, it is granting law enforcement the power and authority as well
as the hardware, to "know", instead of simply relying on what legal
professionals debate or find, or what a group of amateurs decides to agree
on. The public would give up almost all privacy, and the Constitution
would have to be redone. It would always be pushing the limits of
technology, and cost an incredible amount.

What is your own proposal? I would be happy to hear it even if that also
took a few hundred posts.

> What they "find" is all we can go by.

And is the criminal record of everyone around you known to any and all
they encounter, for there to be any practical difference between actual
legal findings and the "metaphysical" truth?

> What the hell are you talking about?

I should ask the same of you.

You and others are on about how we cannot know the "metaphysical"
regarding criminal guilt. I have recognized the limitations in my own
post, because at the minimum, only the criminal themselves will know the
truth about what they have done.

Tell me how you know whether or not random strangers around you, or even
people you consider recent good friends, are convicted criminals or have
lost a civil suit. Do you conduct background checks or make a practice of
asking personal questions to know what can be known about them in the
earthly sense?

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that
I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"