Eugene Shubert wrote:
> 
> "jsp" <jupiterscientific2004b@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:6583e4ad.0410202221.4cef5d4a@posting.google.com...
> advertising
> > http://www.jupiterscientific.org/sciinfo/index.html
> > http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html
> 
> Your page:
> http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html#quantumissues
> says
> 
> "Special relativity destroyed the concept of ether. General relativity
> resurrected it."
> 
> If we are to think of GR as a mechanistic theory, then I would be
> forced to agree. The concept of an aether is required. Spacetime
> is the aether.

You fucking imbecile,

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
 No aether
http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
 No Lorentz violation

Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 060403 (2003)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(9) 549 (1979)
Phys. Bull. 21 255 (1970)
Europhysics Lett. 56(2) 170 (2001)
Gen. Rel. Grav. 34(9) 1371 (2002)

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf