Re: paradox in quantum mechanics
Eugene Shubert wrote:
>
> "jsp" <jupiterscientific2004b@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:6583e4ad.0410202221.4cef5d4a@posting.google.com...
> advertising
> > http://www.jupiterscientific.org/sciinfo/index.html
> > http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html
>
> Your page:
> http://www.jupiterscientific.org/review/tfotc.html#quantumissues
> says
>
> "Special relativity destroyed the concept of ether. General relativity
> resurrected it."
>
> If we are to think of GR as a mechanistic theory, then I would be
> forced to agree. The concept of an aether is required. Spacetime
> is the aether.
You fucking imbecile,
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
No aether
http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation
Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 060403 (2003)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(9) 549 (1979)
Phys. Bull. 21 255 (1970)
Europhysics Lett. 56(2) 170 (2001)
Gen. Rel. Grav. 34(9) 1371 (2002)
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735