Kevin Gowen wrote:

> Declan Murphy wrote:
> 
>> Kevin Gowen wrote:
>>
>>> Declan Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kevin Gowen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Declan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Cash wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:01:54 +0900, Declan Murphy
>>>>>>> <declan_murphy@hotmail.com> brought down from the Mount tablets
>>>>>>> inscribed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michael Cash wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11 Aug 2004 23:47:06 -0700, geoffthatcher@my-deja.com (Geoff
>>>>>>>>> Thatcher) brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>>>> news:<2nvtbmF50andU2@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, this tells me nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - Kevin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would someone please tell me why Kevin Gowen is showing up on 
>>>>>>>>>> my screen again?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do believe my chatbox is broken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Somebody tell me who Geoff Thatcher is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Margaret's son of course. I thought you said you served in 
>>>>>>>> Reagan's navy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, but we were busy watching out for *his* son. The one in
>>>>>>> leotards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean Ron? The (relatively) sensible one?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you know that he is an expert in biotechnology?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't! Though that notwithstanding apparently he is going to give 
>>>> a speech at some shindig about it too. Do you think he should wear 
>>>> tights for the occasion? Showbiz and the theater being all in the 
>>>> family et al? He isn't too old for the Tasmanian Errol Flynn style 
>>>> approach, or perhaps the speech could be delivered more in line with 
>>>> a Laurence Olivier style soliloquy? His old man was a bit of a 
>>>> Shakespeare fan afterall. And it would get lots of publicity for the 
>>>> speech methinks. Plus on Fox News at least there would be no mention 
>>>> of purple hearts for at least 24 hours.
>>>
>>> Haven't you heard? Fox News has adopted a hardline anti-Israel policy 
>>> in hopes of getting the Canadian Radio-television and 
>>> Telecommunications Commission's approval. It worked for Al-Jazeera.
>>
>> Sounds like BS to me. 
> 
> It sure is BS that the Canadian government doesn't its citizens watch 
> anything they want. If you watch Fox News in Canada, you are committing 
> a crime. If men weren't allowed to marry men, you'd almost forget that 
> Canada is the cradle of freedom.

So which verb was supposed to come after "doesn't"? Oh and ah, cue Jason.

>> Must be at least 35 years since the dirty digger has needed to grovel 
>> for approvals from anyone. 
> 
> Well, you know those Canadians. They have very delicate sensibilities. 
> The CRTC asked Al-Jazeera distributors to edit out "abusive comment."

Cue Jason again.

>> So what about those tights? Appropriate or no? 
> 
> I must admit that the man is hung.

Not an old sock?

>> Perhaps Patti could provide some background entertainment on the big 
>> screen during the speech. Yunno, page 3 style - Rupert would lap it up.
> 
> I don't think so. I saw her in Playboy and she has weird nipples.

I haven't seen it, but no doubt there will one day eventually be a 
suitable likeness in a wax museum in Saitama for my education or 
edification.

-- 
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on"