John Hall wrote:
> In article <JYadnXIfzoh6bKneRVnysg@pipex.net>,
> Matt Wheeler <spam@007jbond.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> <snip>
>> I doubt it... I think that carrying a 33 or 34lb bat whilst running
>> 90 (or more) feet would hinder them somewhat...
>
> Surely that weight can't be right? For comparison, a cricket bat, of
> roughly similar size though admittedly made of wood, only weighs 2 to
> 3 lb.

I think he means 33 or 34 oz not pounds.