Vaughn L.Porter <vaughnp@pcez.com> wrote in message
news:v43u8d1i5jra7e@corp.supernews.com...
> James M <ozone@snip.net> wrote in message
> news:3e41b01b$1@snipnews.snip.net...
> > > > > I see you don't support the administration's efforts to make Iraq
> > comply
> > > > with the post-Gulf War ceasefire agreement. Care to
> > > > > elaborate why?
> > > > >
> > > > One word : OIL!
> > >
> > > Well, that certainly is quite vague. Baby oil? Olive oil? What about
> oil??
> > O_o
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sickle584th
> > >
> > >
> >  I think its about a number of things. #1 Unseating Sadam Hussain for a
> more
> > U.S. freindly government would probly help our supply of cheap oil..
>
> Absolutly. After all, if we had a non-OPEC petroleum source, the
> upper-classes could drive those monster SUVs without worry. Hell, who'd
care
> about emmisions and fuel economy then (beside the
> "Fringe" environmentalists)?

Oh! don't even get me started my Slow Ugly Vehicle spchele!


>
>
> > #2
> > George W. Bush wants to be re-elected in a few years and needs something
> > positive to point to when his campagn begins.
>
> Like it would matter. He's going to be a single-termer, regardless of what
> he does.

That dependes on what kinda loser the democrats pick. Some conspericy nuts
say the secret government picks the canadates so the know which party will
win. I'm begining to agree with them.

> > #3 George and the Republican
> > party need a large distraction to take Joe Averages attention away from
> the
> > way they are setting up all their rich friends to get much richer.
>
> No kidding!

The worse part is his rich friends win no matter how things turn out.

>
> > #4 Even a
> > brief conflict justifies hundereds of millions of dollars in millitary
> > spending,a trick which has been used to booster a lagging econemy in
times
> > past.
>
> Well, so far, war concernes seem to be making things worse instead of
> better. Seems every time Iraq becomes the main topic in the news, the
market
> goes south.

Historicly that is common for the short term. After the production lines
start cranking out batches of cruise missles at $10 million a pop things
tended to get better. Wait and see, maybe the core has rotted away too badly
to paint over it this time.

>
> > #5 lastly, as the last member of the Reagan dynasty President Bush is
> > dead set on getting his name in the history books for something major
> almost
> > regardless of the cost.
>
> Oh, he'll go in the history books, just not how he's going to want to be
> remembered.

what do you expect they'll say?

>
> >     Just my opinion, Take it with a grain of salt and wash back with
> > tequila.
> >
> Personnaly, I'd say you're right on target. Don't blame you for the
> ta-kill-ya, though; seems like life's bad enough to drive us all to drink.
>
>                            Vaughn L.Porter
>                             And that's the way it is.
>

I used to be republican, still registed as such but rarely vote for any. The
democrats have nice goals without the backbone to make them happen.
 DAM YOU TO HELL Ross Perot! He was our best chance to break the status-qou
till he dropped out, even if was nuts.
    If any Brits are reading, how does your goverment funtion with all those
different parties? Does it seem to work better than having two fighting
against each other instead of getting  things done?