Ernest Schaal wrote:

> > Go back and learn for yourself who brought up Bush and Americans, to see who I
> > was responding to before you jumped back in.
>
> Why should I, when you can provide me with that information easily?

It was Norman.

> After
> all, Eric, the world does not revolve around you and the world does not have
> to obey your every command.

So why should I have to listen to you if you don't want to do it yourself?

> You can easily give me the information you referred to, if you thought it
> was important.

It is you who thinks it is important who said what, not I.

> The fact that you can't be bothered to do it tells me that
> either the information is not there or that it isn't important even for you
> to be bothered with.

It is not important, and I don't know why you think it is.

> If it is too unimportant for you to include in your
> message, why should I waste my time looking it up?

Because it is you who cares.

> If you have any views on the topic you can state them, otherwise I consider
> your messages waste of bandwidth.

Don't read, lawyer with the valuable time. No one asked you back at all.