Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!Q.T.Honey!enews.sgi.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: kaz@ivebeenframed.com (Kaz)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.japan,fj.life.in-japan,soc.culture.korean,soc.culture.german
Subject: Re: Why Koreans hate Japanese
Date: 26 May 2003 06:48:06 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <365fcc52.0305260548.4b07f48c@posting.google.com>
References: <384b9be.0305191349.2a080ed4@posting.google.com> <baeqqn$sjdhk$1@ID-169501.news.dfncis.de> <365fcc52.0305210058.7b6a5d7c@posting.google.com> <baga6q$svvpg$1@ID-169501.news.dfncis.de> <365fcc52.0305211539.597ffdc@posting.google.com> <bahsb0$uh$1@kanna.cc.sophia.ac.jp> <365fcc52.0305232156.7695534a@posting.google.com> <banqne$1pmck$1@ID-169501.news.dfncis.de> <365fcc52.0305252301.5a59663b@posting.google.com> <365fcc52.0305260244.3015e821@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.22.248.13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1053956886 9929 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2003 13:48:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2003 13:48:06 GMT
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:102

"John R. Yamamoto- Wilson" <john@rarebooksinjapan.com> wrote in message news:bat2gr$1u6p$1@kanna.cc.sophia.ac.jp...

<snipped>

> I am sure I have been ironic, and I may have been satirical, but I don't
> think I have been sarcastic. And I haven't been wild about it. I've chosen
> my words with care.

But surely you hurted me, so it's sarcasm. I'm very nervous about
people ethnically insult me because of being Kansai-jin.

> I told you what I thought of your exchange of insults with Supertech, and
> you responded by trying to put me on the defensive, calling me a racist. I
> showed that the grounds for assuming I was racist were false, and you seemed
> to accept that. But to me the big deal is not whether *I* am racist, but
> whether *you* were crude and offensive.
> 
> Conclusion: you *were* and *are* crude and offensive ("wanking tokyojaps",
> et cetera, et cetera, et boring bloody cetera).

Accorfing to your theory, calling someone as "crude" is an offensive
drivel isn't it?
Tokyojaps, the honorary whites  are really offensive and aggressive to
us. I can't do nothing about that. It's not our fault but their own.
They are scornfully calling me and Kansai-jin as Chon(Koreans), and
severely despising us, so I have morally right to despise them. If
they ever stop insulting us, I will stop calling them so.

> Now, if you want to call a truce at this stage, that's fine, I have no
> further quarrel with you. Call people all the rude names you want, just so
> long as you know that, from where I'm sitting, all that kind of name-calling
> is subhuman drivel.

You would have treated us as "subhuman drivel" anyway no matter what I
say.