Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> Raj Feridun wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:12:43 -0500, Kevin Gowen
>><kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>No, I think one is declared innocent of the crimes once they've been
>>>>acquitted.
>>
>>>You think wrong. Nothing of the kind is declared. There is a very good
>>>reason why the verdict is "not guilty" rather than "innocent".
>>
>>It means Clinton is declared not guilty of the specific offenses for
>>which he was charged. He is legally blameless. Spin it all you like.
> 
> 
> Do you believe not prosecuted or not "guilty" equals "did not do"?

He believed that cellphone users were going to usher in a Kerry
landslide, so anything is possible.

- Kevin