"FreddieN" <Pacbel2973@dlink.net> wrote in message
news:aZsdd.5872$UX3.2267@trndny03...
>
> "thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:1098272169.KN/+pfN05XDyCvgDfCGXFw@teranews...
> > "Miguel Cruz" <mnc@admin.u.nu> wrote in message
> > news:hrWdnUJe-sKr2ujcRVn-rA@speakeasy.net...
> > > thegoons <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > > > Funny how they try and fake it too, the Thai stewardesses had
> obviously
> > > > been handpicked, they chose those that most resembled Japanese, put
> > their
> > > > hairstyles in the same JAL standard and try to flog-off an inferior
> > cheap
> > > > "product" at JAL premium prices.
> > >
> > > I don't get it - in what way are Thai people inferior to Japanese
> people?
> >
> > I agree, therefore JAL should pay them equal rates. I have nothing
against
> > the Thai people. Rather, I object to JAL's greed, then to pretend the
> staff
> > are Nihon-jin by putting them in stereotype JP hairstyle, uniform etc.
> >
>
> So you would object if a group of Hungarian women were hired by Air France
> and
> FORCED to wear Air France flight attendant uniforms and wear their hair in
a
> style
> approved by the company?
> You would then complain that Air France were using "inferior" Hungarians,
> pretending they were French?

Not if they were paid the same