Michael Cash wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:08:27 -0400, Kevin Gowen
> <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> brought down from the Mount tablets
> inscribed:
> 
> 
>>Michael Cash wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:44:05 -0400, Kevin Gowen
>>><kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> brought down from the Mount tablets
>>>inscribed:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>John W. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Michael Cash <mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote in message news:<ut3mi0lni27bj0s8hjbr784og0h9ruceia@4ax.com>...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>There must be something being questioned. Kerry's campaign staff keeps
>>>>>>putting out different versions of stories in response to *something*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not sure what advisor told Kerry to continue making a big deal out
>>>>>of that issue, but they really need to stop. They're playing into
>>>>>Bush's hand. If he wants to win he needs to put that red herring aside
>>>>>and focus on some real issues; Americans have shown that we really
>>>>>don't care about the military record of or president. If we did
>>>>>Clinton and Bush wouldn't have gotten elected, particularly Bush who
>>>>>was running against a true war hero (McCain)
>>>>
>>>>How about particularly Clinton, who ran against true war heroes both times?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I finished reading "Unfit for Command" today.
>>>
>>>I would like to take this opportunity to publicly apologize to Bill
>>>Clinton for thinking him the biggest sleaze the Dems could possibly
>>>dredge up.
>>
>>It's a goodun, is it? I'll have to pick up a copy.
> 
> 
> It was a very interesting read.
> 
> It is interesting that the swiftvets group seems to always be cast as
> a group which has a hard-on over the validity of Kerry's medals. I
> found that to be a very minor part of the book. They're more ticked
> over his activities around 1971-1972.

I see that you have been fooled by the right-wing whackos. There are no 
Vietnam veterans against John Kerry, because being against John Kerry 
strips a person of his Vietnam veteran status. I know this is true 
because I read it in the NY Times and there is no leftist bias in this 
country's media.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/23/politics/campaign/23swift.html?hp

"The exchanges came as aides in both camps said the dispute over Mr. 
Kerry's war record was now at the center of the race in the week leading 
into Mr. Bush's nominating convention in New York City. And some 
Democrats close to Mr. Kerry said they feared that the very thing that 
had led the party to see him as its strongest challenger to Mr. Bush, 
his record as a decorated combat veteran in Vietnam, was now threatening 
to undermine his candidacy because of criticism raised by some *former* 
Vietnam veterans."

>>Just came back from seeing Boortz and Hannity live.
> 
> 
> I like Hannity, but I wish he had a more pleasing accent.

Poor thing. He can't help being a Yankee.

- Kevin