X-Received: by 10.58.77.104 with SMTP id r8mr15507152vew.40.1401227507361; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.32.166 with SMTP id h35mr63509qgh.23.1401227507207; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: news.ccsf.jp!tomockey.ddo.jp!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!c1no18618695igq.0!news-out.google.com!qf4ni13600igc.0!nntp.google.com!c1no18618692igq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: fj.sci.physics Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=151.16.189.83; posting-account=QLD1RAoAAABz5UHE-o4vwRcyqjxuyD8O NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.16.189.83 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <24caadf5-e6de-4972-ade1-9a60c179e9ef@googlegroups.com> Subject: new ether From: gattosilvestro50va@gmail.com Injection-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:51:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 13924 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2561687741 Xref: news.ccsf.jp fj.sci.physics:1767 It 's been nearly a century since Physics has abandoned the ether putting i= n its place the nothingness of the void. Well, in that nothingness nothing = should happen, instead there are many physical phenomena: the dielectric an= d magnetic polarization of vacuum as in the matter, the displacement curren= t, the fields that can exert forces at a distance, the energy associated wi= th the fields, the electric potential of the vacuum, the curvature of the v= acuum, there is also the temperature of the vacuum. There are also hundreds= of radio and television broadcasts, so that, for the current physics, we h= ave the absolute vacuum with inside the news! Moreover, always in a vacuum, are generated and annihilate the virtual part= icles, predominantly electron positron pairs, and it has also widespread pr= esence of energy, of bosons and other particles. We know there is energy associated with the fields in space, then we have t= he absolute vacuum that it should not contain anything, instead, ironically= , it contains joules of energy. First with ether, it was possible to associate the states of the ether with= these real physical phenomena . Actually to explain everything that happens in a vacuum the University and = the textbooks use the concept of the field defined as abstract state of not= hingness of the vacuum, and they speak of "intrinsic physics properties o= f empty space", which is always a abstract thinking, because in the nothing= ness of the vacuum there can not be anything that could give support to the= se physical properties or to the field. For example, for electromagnetic waves in space, physics official speaks of= - a swing of the electromagnetic polarization of the vacuum propagates in = space -., Which is purely abstract idea, because if there is nothing, what = is that oscillates? It 's like saying: in the vacuum there is nothing , but= there is something that varies, but there is nothing. But since all these phenomena occur in space really, than should cast doub= t on the fact that the space is empty. The great majority of scientists in fact was in favor of ether. Descartes argued that to make logical sense to spatial extension it is nece= ssary a medium. Newton, for gravitational forces, wrote that support that two distant bodie= s may act at a distance of one another without the presence of an intermedi= ate medium, is a complete nonsense. Maxwell considered the electromagnetic fields as physical states of polariz= ation of the ether. Einstein at first abandoned the ether; however, after presenting the theory= of general relativity in which he speaks of the curvature of space, in fro= nt of the evident paradox of nothingness of vacuum that would become bent,= retraced his thoughts and then presented a new model of the ether which wi= ll be discussed later. Despite this and despite the obvious inconsistencies of the vacuum, in the = twentieth century the ether was removed, giving to the nothingness of empty= all the abstract properties mentioned before, and making them believe for = real. All these abstract concepts are now in common use and we have forgott= en that they are abstract, infact a lot of people think that in order to ex= plain the forces that two bodies exchange at distance, is sufficient to exc= laim: - with the field! - and then draw two vectors on a sheet of paper or = on the blackboard. No wonder as an entity completely abstract, as the field= in the vacuum, may instead exert forces true and real. It is obvious that = something is missing. The same argument can be made for the curvature of th= e vacuum. Let us now examine the main reasons that led to the abandonment of the ethe= r. They are: the experiment of Michelson - Morley, the principle of relativity= and the ether wind that should slow moving objects because all the old mod= els of the ether considered objects like foreign bodies. =20 Michelson=E2=80=99s Interfer= ometer The Michelson - Morley experiment was performed in America in 1887, it uses= the interferometer shown schematically in the figure. Here briefly say tha= t two beams perpendicular to each other, obtained by a semitransparent mirr= or, after being re-reflected, reach an interferometer capable of assessing = the interference fringes, so that the recomposition of the two waves, after= the respective journeys, proves if there is delayed relative to each other= . It 's the problem of the two swimmers, one must cross the river by swimmi= ng perpendicular to the current is outward and return journeys, the other m= ust cover the same distance swimming against the current first and then in = favor of the current. In the experiment, the two swimmers are the two rays = of light and the river current is the flow of ether through the instrument = in motion with the Earth. The beam perpendicular to the motion should come before, instead, with sur= prise, the two rays arrived together without phase shift. The negative result of the experiment was immediately used by detractors of= the ether to deny its existence. The Irish Fitzgerald, however, was the first to propose an idea that is cur= ious and innovative and that the side of the interferometer parallel to the= motion of the Earth makes a contraction according to the formula: =C2=B7 l =3D lo=E2=88=9A (1-=CE=B2 =C2=B2). with =CE=B2 =3D v / c v = speed of the object, c the speed of light in order to make perfectly identical times of the two paths. At first it ju= st seemed strange and arbitrary hypothesis, but soon after was made very pl= ausible by theoretical investigations of Lorentz and Larmor.=20 The two scientists proposed as follows: the shape and dimensions of a body = depend on the cohesive forces between the atoms and between molecules; the = nature of these forces is of the electromagnetic type and ether is the medi= um in which these forces are established, then these forces may vary as a f= unction of the speed of the ether relative to the body and as a result ther= e will be a rearrangement of the shape and the size of the body, in accorda= nce with the formula of Fitzgerald. During the twentieth century this contraction has been verified as true and= real in many experiments with particle accelerators. This contraction is also one of the basic concepts of the theory of relativ= ity, known as the contraction of the rulers in motion, or of Fitzgerald =E2= =80=93 Lorentz Then the experiment of Michelson - Morley failed to detect the motion of th= e Earth with respect to the ether because the delay of one of the two light= waves is perfectly compensated by the contraction of the side of interfero= meter parallel to the motion. However, still to our days, there are persons= that propose the experiment of Michelson - Morley as proof of non-existenc= e of the ether, ignoring the Fitzgerald contraction They were tempted several other experiments, all with negative results beca= use there is always a contraction of Fitzgerald somewhere. At the end we ar= e convinced that it will never be possible to determine our state of absolu= te motion, at least looking only within our laboratory. From this non observability of uniform motion with respect to space derive= s the principle of relativity: it is impossible to determine the absolute u= niform motion with respect to space (looking only within your lab). Some persons claim that the principle of relativity, denying the existence = of an absolute reference bound by the ether, also denies the existence of t= he ether. But this is wrong, because the non-existence of an absolute refer= ence comes only, as we have seen, by the impossibility of its experimental = determination. All the old models of ether considered the objects as extraneous bodies, th= at with the motion were subject to wind ether, instead just does not exist,= and this was the main cause of his abandoned. The new model of the ether, proposed by Einstein after 1916, considered the= matter as a result of the energy in the ether itself and not as a foreign = body, in this way you no longer have the wind ether. But before talking abo= ut that, it is necessary to consider what is really the mass and the matt= er. We know that matter is made of atoms, and the word atom literally means: - = that you can not cut - or --indivisible. Term was never used more inappropriately. In fact we find the nucleus inside the atom, within the nucleus are protons= and neutrons, and within which are the quarks. At the time of their discovery, all these components were considered indiv= isible, building blocks of matter. It is still currently with quarks, altho= ugh it is known for some time that also the quarks are composite elements. Regard to the volumes we see that the protons and neutrons are bilions time= s smaller than atoms, so that all the nucleons that make up the volume of a= person occupying about one millionth of a cubic millimeter. The quarks the= mselves are billions of times smaller than nucleons, and in turn are made o= f something, not yet well defined, but much smaller than quarks themselves. All these corpuscles, according to physics, are united from the binding ene= rgy and by fields and quantums associated with this energy In order to break down the particles gradually becoming smaller it is neces= sary energy gradually becoming bigger, serving only the material means nece= ssary to reach these energies, then what is considered indivisible in turn = will be broken up into much smaller shares. In conclusion if we look inside the particles that make up matter, we find = just energy and quantums associated with it. A new possible physical picture that takes full account of the above consid= erations and of the new model of the ether already mentioned, can be as fol= lows: each particle is created by energy, it is an event that takes place i= n the ether where the oscillatory state of energy exceeds the quantum level= s, and that annihilates where falls below these levels, to reform immediate= ly after. With the energy now associated with a real physical state of the ether, and= not as abstract state of the vacuum. Even the fields, in this new picture,= find full logical sense as ether condition and not as abstract concepts i= n the vacuum. The ether is then the solid and three-dimensional scenery wh= ich supports all the physical reality, from field to matter. The energy that generates all the particles of a macroscopic body can move = freely in the ether together with the body generated without encountering a= ny resistance, if not the opposite of external fields. This allows to the b= ody to move freely in space, as do the planets and all the moving objects, = without the opposition of the ether wind. The ether, as well as giving logical sense to the spatial extensions, now a= lso assumes the properties of the Mother Substance which contains within it= self all the physics: fields, energy, particles, and macroscopic bodies. Al= so humans, and all living species, are forms of energy in the ether. This new physical conception gives full meaning to the correspondence betwe= en mass and energy expressed by the famous formula E =3D mc =C2=B2, and to = the corpuscular and wave nature of particles. The forces at a distance, or interactions, find a clear and coherent explan= ation as to the tendency of the ether to assume the state of minimum potent= ial energy, when there are two or more bodies. Even the three formulas of Fitzgerald - Lorentz: =C2=B7 l =3D lo=E2=88=9A (1-=CE=B2 =C2=B2), m =3D mo / =E2=88=9A (1-=CE= =B2 =C2=B2), t '=3D t / =E2=88=9A (1-=CE=B2 =C2=B2), with =CE= =B2 =3D v / c can clearly be interpreted as a tendency of energy, which originates object= s, to change state, shape and magnitude as a function of speed. The energy that generates all of physical reality, including ourselves, rem= ember the creative breath of the Sacred Scriptures, or prana of Eastern rel= igions. And here we find a meeting point between science and religion. In fact, recognizing the energy as a principle of existence of all matter f= rom the particles to living organisms, and considering the objects no longe= r independent in an empty space and alien, but events generated by the ener= gy in the ether and belonging to it, overcome the purely materialistic poin= t of view of physics. G.= R. - Genoa - For further clarification and examples, see: Mass Energy Particles Fields F= orces and New Ether of Physics, on Google, always by the same author. Or visit the site http://www.ricercaetereperduto.it =20