In article <umldc1n9pqtb25@corp.supernews.com>, "Disaster"
<disaster@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:

>"OnsenMark" <locutusxx@aol.combatrock> wrote:
>> "Disaster" <disaster@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>> You. Don't. GET IT. Stop rationalizing for a second, and just listen...
>er,
>> read.
>
>No Mark you are not thinking.
>

I *AM* thinking. And you're STILL rationalizing.

>> So Morgan put his mailing address online for whatever reason. Does that
>give
>> you ANY right, at all, to post it whereever you please, without any form
>of
>> permission to do so? So Morgan's placing his mailing address on his
>website
>> doesn't constitute a privacy violation. That STILL doesn't give you the
>right
>> to do what you want with it.
>
>Bottom line is I have not done anything wrong. I have not done anything
>that I don't have the right to do. When you put your information on a
>public forum you are giving the public the right to do with it what they
>wish to. You are effectively handing it out to everyone.
>

Where does it SAY you can? Tell me this, please. And if this is the case, then
why don't you put your mailing address out there for the world to see?

>> Let me put it this way... put yourself in Morgan's shoes for a second.
>How
>> would YOU feel if someone posted your mailing address to a newsgroup?
>
>If they got it from the same source or some other public forum I'd be
>fine. It's my own fault for putting it there and if I did put it there I
>know what the consequences are. You and anyone else are free to look it up
>and post it. Hell I'll do it for you if you like, but I do keep the
>information up to date as I've done a bit of moving lately.
>

Disregard the previous comment. Still, that's no excuse to do what you did, no
matter the reason. But evidently you're amoral, so, oh fucking well.

>> If it were me, I'd be getting the guy kicked off his ISP for abuse
>violations(I don't
>> know if what you did constitutes any sort of abuse violation -- some
>ISPs might
>> frowm on this sort of thing), but that's just me.
>
>If I were the ISP I'd be telling you it's your own damn fault for
>releasing the info in the first place.
>
>> And those two people... are you even including anyone who might have
>complained
>> in the other thread? Think about that one.
>
>No, that would up the numbers a little. Say 4? I don't know have you
>counted?
>

Of course, everyone that has commented in my post on LiveJournal about this so
far agrees with me, basically stating that it was absolutely the wrong thing to
do, no matter what. Maybe I should also point them to the relevant threads on
Google, and let them judge for themselves further. But suffice it to say that
they don't like you.

>> Now, if you continue to rationalize that you are completely in the right
>in
>> this instance, then there is no point in talking to you about this any
>further.
>
>Mark, there was no point from the beginning.

And obviously, you're an *amoral* somebody. -_-

Mark. 8)
- proud member of the WGPS and the SDA!
-UtenaCode(1.1) U:6 F:Wa+++Ju++ D:Ak->Sh- X:*** a:39++ M:f ZUM(w/Banyuu
Inryoku)
"BE HAPPY FOR ME AND MY SHOE. O_O" - Verthandi
http://www.evafaq.com