grunt100@msn.com (grunt100@msn.com) wrote in message news:<5ba2f89c.0306260236.7678c31c@posting.google.com>...
> "USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in message news:<6BsKa.17249$Kg7.2690@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>...
> > > First, you didn't make no case whatsoever.  You don't even define what is
> > > an anti-Japanese racism, or an anti-Japanese attitude.  I am talking about
> > > facts.  Categorize the facts (Japan's past wrongs that Japan didn't
>  account
> > > fully to this day) I am talking about.
> > >
> > Japan not accounting for past actions is one thing, but to start talking
> > about
> > Japan "suiting itself" when they were iun noi such position to do so
> > is patently ridiculous ot tained by a anti-japanese racist bias.
> 
> 
> So, now you concede Japan has not been accounting for past deeds?
> 
> Japan's been hiding behind pacifist constitution bestow by Americans.
> Period.  Hirohito's role as head of state, forbidden to make political
> statments in just one example.  One of reasons offered by Japan as to
> why Hirohito never apologized for things Japan has done to Korea (under
> Hirohito's name), is that Hirohito is prohibited to make political
> statments.  Yes, indeed, it suits Japan.  
> 
> If these facts are anti-Japan racism, as you wrote, then what you call 
> your usage of words like moron, idiot, etc?  Proactive ignorance?
> 
> 
> > > Second, you have used words like moron against me in other thread without
> > > any justification whatsoever.  Here, you call me an idiot.  For what
>  reason?
> > > If you don't have better things to write, just be gone.  Soc.culture.korea
>  n
> > > has seen trolls in the past and it doesn't need another one now.
> > 
> > I called you an idiot because you could not see that I criticized you for
> > saying "suited Japan"
> > then gave you reasons why it actually "suited the US" and your only response
> > to that
> > was  "It all suited the United States.  So, what is your point?".
> > That is idiotic.
> 
> You mean you are really a girlsish lumberjack?  No, actually, what I 
> meant to say is, what of "suited Japan" makes you tickle?  Do you concede
> Japan has not been fully accounting for its past?  Do you have any idea
> what are issues Korea/Koreans have with Japan?  If you do, can you enumerate
> few issues here so that I know I am talking with a person who knows the
> topic.  THis way, we'll have in open what you do or don't know and/or
> concede, and then we'll have starting point.  It's better first stablish
> certain facts instead of talking to a hot aired "suited Japan" tickle.

First off, Japanese people don't need Korean people to speak for us.
Second, stop posting shit in the god damn fj.soc.politics newsgroup.