Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "richasiankid@hotmail.com" Newsgroups: soc.culture.asian.american,soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.china,fj.life.in-japan,soc.culture.korean Subject: Re: There are no white people. Used to be: Why are white people so ridiculously superior? Date: 27 Oct 2005 21:48:56 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 63 Message-ID: <1130474936.595474.124780@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> References: <1129264394.851181.131310@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4352ab83$0$1726$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr> <1129670197.401796.38780@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <435ad0c2$1_7@galaxy.uncensored-news.com> <1130035777.399444.145860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <435cabc9_3@galaxy.uncensored-news.com> <1130356997.709377.27570@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43609a3d$0$5373$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.42.58.182 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1130474942 31950 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2005 04:49:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:49:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.42.58.182; posting-account=OO0giAwAAAB7Mp7hRgy3BGZ96NFGyDC4 Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:30216 On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:13:35 +0200, b thought carefully and wrote: >> You have supported his point - I think he's asking about affirmative >> action programs. Just as there is no reason to discriminate *against* >> someone, there is no reason to discriminate *for* someone either. > Jim has already exmplained this once. I'll try. >... *even though* you recognize that there is "no reason to discriminate > against" people classified in one particular group....., why should a > government not recognize this situation, and take action *based on the > actual discrimination process at stake* to try and level things out? Perfect. Could not have said it better myself. -- Love, Jim ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- ======================================================= Whoa just caught this....you disappoint me. You have to resort to *editing* someone else's comments and then you acquiesce. 'b' can probably articulate your position better than you can, not that that matters. I am still waiting for YOUR response - not b's response - to the article that I cited earlier though: "But here's another interesting 21st century definition: http://shrn.stanford.edu/workshops/revisitingrace/Risch_confound.pdf Abstract: We have analyzed genetic data for 326 microsatellite markers that were typed uniformly in a large multiethnic population-based sample of individuals as part of a study of the genetics of hypertension (Family Blood Pressure Program). Subjects identified themselves as belonging to one of four major racial/ethnic groups (white, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic) and were recruited from 15 different geographic locales within the United States and Taiwan. Genetic cluster analysis of the microsatellite markers produced four major clusters, which showed near-perfect correspondence with the four self-reported race/ethnicity categories. Of 3,636 subjects of varying race/ ethnicity, only 5 (0.14%) showed genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity. On the other hand, we detected only modest genetic differentiation between different current geographic locales within each race/ethnicity group. Thus, ancient geographic ancestry, which is highly correlated with self-identified race/ ethnicity-as opposed to current residence-is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population. Implications of this genetic structure for case-control association studies are discussed. " I mean, if you're honest, you can just come out of the closet and say that science is lying and is merely a tool for domination. Look, feminists say this all the time, like those thrusting cadences in Beethoven's 9th?