Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: barath.sundar@gmail.com Newsgroups: japan.sports.baseball,rec.sport.baseball,rec.sport.cricket,uk.sport.baseball,us.sport.baseball Subject: Re: Comparison between cricket and baseball Date: 24 Sep 2005 14:58:05 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 12 Message-ID: <1127599085.416221.293170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <4332b0c5$0$11741$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <1127398745.903868.247830@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.154.123.216 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1127599090 25362 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2005 21:58:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.154.123.216; posting-account=hEp2eQ0AAACjkeMMPYiN44p4Z3d-e_pD Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org japan.sports.baseball:171 Roger Moore wrote: > > I don't think that a new cricket ball is appreciably harder than a > baseball. And you would be mistaken. Don't just accept my assertion .... http://www.peak.sfu.ca/gopher/94-1/issue12/cricket.ans