Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf2.xephion.ne.jp!feed2.sphere.ad.jp!feed1.sphere.ad.jp!newsfeed2.kddnet.ad.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: marthawhite2000@yahoo.co.uk
Newsgroups: fj.soc.misc
Subject: What is an alpha males?
Date: 9 Feb 2005 20:31:15 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <1108009875.878999.316490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.18.195.197
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1108009882 6222 127.0.0.1 (10 Feb 2005 04:31:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:31:22 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.18.195.197;
   posting-account=mab-FA0AAAAKgXk3AV9Wpx_ogQrajEkR
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.soc.misc:755

Many feminists argue that prohitibition of prostitution and polygamy
protect women's right.

What right is protected by prohibiting consensual offers from males?

What about women that want several husband? What about women that would
rather share a handsome, smart, rich male than be the only one for a
poor dumb violent one?

How many females got beaten up by violent dumb males because those
females do not have enough loving billionares playboy to pick?

What about women's right to rent her womb or cunt to the highest
bidder? What about women's right to choose any rich males that want to
have sex with her for money?

Without prohibition of consensual acts, women that got beaten up just
once by a boyfriend, can say, "fuck it I am done", and quickly choose
to become a misress for a loving rich male. No need to count on cops or
anything. Those violent bastard were lucky if they got chosen in the
first place.

In many countries where genital multilation is common,
The more a male doesn't have positive intensive to mate with females,
the more likely the male would, out of jealousy, use negative
intensives to keep women in line.

In many countries, women face genital mutilation, burned alive, etc.
Without prohibition of prostitution, women can quickly go to males that
can resort to positive intensives, like money, to persuade females,
rather than negative intensives motivated by jealousy.

Without regulation against consensual acts, women also have more
choices to earn quick money and become financially independent by
performing in strip clubs, selling virginity, etc.

Also, I believe the true purpose of anti prostitution, anti polygamy,
and child support law is to take away choices from females. It's there
to ration females to less desirable poorer financially irresponsible
males.

I am not against women being financially independent. 50% of females
are smarter than 50% of males. So yes, women can be anything they want
too. Engineer, astronout, boxer, nude boxer, etc. However, women will
be better of even further if they can take advantage of monetary
consensual offers from males.

Christian would love this too. When prostitution is allowed, women can
say, I'll bear a baby for $1 million. Now, which women would abort
their baby if good rich daddy will pay her $1 million for delivering
his.

Not just money. The rich often carry better genes. Women are more
likely to abort their baby when the quality of the sperm that knock her
up is low. If a woman have a potentially genius baby, why abort it?

It's a win win solution. The only person that got anything to lose is
the less desirable poor males. Ugly feminists that are jealous of what
pretty women can achieve might also disagree, but even they can aim
"higher" without sex regulation. But fuck them. Women can vote too
right? Vote for freedom. Vote for women choice! Vote libertarian
solutions.

"Know the truth, the truth will set you free" - Jesus.
"...But before it does, it will make you angry." -Jerry Joiner
Bob