THE FOLLOWING WORK CONTAINS A MASS/FREQUENCY CHANGE CONCEPT THAT I
BELIEVE SOLVES THE QUESTION AS TO WHY MASS MOVES AT ALL.  IT ALSO
CLARIFIES WHY OUR WORLD IS ONE OF PRESENT TIME ONLY, WITH THERE BEING
NO POSSIBILITY OF TIME TRAVEL TO EITHER THE PAST OR FUTURE.



THE PROBLEM AND REPAIR OF RELATIVITY


(C) 2004, Duane Ertle




In order to introduce the problem, I am going to quote a few sentences
from a book "The Universe and Dr. Einstein," by Lincoln Barnett,
published in 1960 by Mentor Books.  The quotes are from pages 61 and 63
respectively.

The first concept involves that of mass.  "In its popular sense,
"mass" is just another word for "weight."  But used by the
physicist, it denotes a rather different and more fundamental property
of matter: namely, resistance to a change of motion.  A greater force
is necessary to move or stop a freight car than a velocipede; the
freight car resists a change in its motion more stubbornly than the
velocipede because it has greater mass. ... But Relativity asserts that
the mass of a moving body is by no means constant, but increases with
its velocity relative to an observer.  In short, energy has mass!"

In the next quote we will look at the reason for this belief.  "By
further deduction from his principle of Relativity of mass, Einstein
arrived at a conclusion of incalculable importance to the world.  His
train of reasoning ran somewhat as follows: since the mass of a moving
body increases as its motion increases, and since motion is a form of
energy (kinetic energy), then the increased mass of a moving body comes
from its increased energy. ..."

Now I am going to quote a paragraph from "The Bones of Time,"
copyrighted in 1978 by Duane Ertle, it is from the chapter 'Flexible
Time.'  "The reason a fast moving mass is so difficult to stop, or
have a direction change in, is due to its becoming frozen in a linear
manner so energy cannot pass through its total volume as happens when
it is at rest.  When a mass moves at one-hundred thousand miles a
second, the energy existent and having potential movement at right
angles to its direction of travel could be at most a distance of
eighty-six thousand miles a second.  When moving at the speed of light
minus two feet per second, the potential energy existent at right
angles to its forward motion would only be two feet in one second.  At
the speed of light the mass would convert from being a
three-dimensional object and would become a single beam of high energy
photons streaking through space, all existing in only one dimension.
Obviously there would be zero energy potential at right angles to the
direction of travel."

Moving mass does not acquire additional mass as it moves.  Atomic
matter is composed of waveform.  As electromagnetic energy (a wave) has
differing energy values, so, also, does mass at different speeds have
an overall differing waveform.  The waveform is derived from the moving
mass itself, as energy at right angles to direction of travel decreases
in line density with movement, and transfers a proportional amount of
that frequency toward the direction of travel.  In this sense greater
"mass" is being added to the forward motion of the mass at the
expense of the energy/mass at right angles to it.

There is an expression that deals with frequency density and an
increase of energy as the lines of frequency increase.  The expression
in question says that E=hf.  The energy of an electromagnetic wave is
equal to that of a very small numerical constant times the frequency of
the wave.  The greater the frequency of the wave, the more energy the
electromagnetic wave would have.  Radio waves may have very long peak
to peak distances of thousands of meters, while cosmic radiation is
able to have its frequency so compressed that it acts as dimensional
mass, and there may be trillions of frequencies, or waves in a single
meter.  Now consider how the frequency at right angles to direction of
movement changes from having great potential in those directions,
toward having less, thus giving up mass/energy potential.  Energy, in
form of greater frequency, converts to an overall change of mass, or as
some would say, "... resistance to a change of motion."

The concept of E=hf is an equation that works for three different
elements of nature:

1. E=hf, is an equation that describes why electromagnetic energy has
greater and lesser energy values.  Radio waves have very little energy
value, while gamma and cosmic radiation have a great deal.  And it all
is dependent upon wave frequency and the density of that wave in a
particular space.

2. mk=hf, (mass kinetic energy, equals hf) describes why mass
"shrinks" to an observer as it moves.  Because mass is composed of
electromagnetic energy, it has the same wave values as electromagnetic
energy, but in a very condensed manner.  Electromagnetic energy remains
in three-dimensional space in form of standing waves, yet having the
same linear value of 186,000 mps all the while.  Like a runner on a
race track traveling all the while at that great speed.  The same
distance is traveled, just not in a straight line.  As long as the
velocity value within mass maintains the value of "c" it does not
matter how small the "race track" becomes.

The, mk=hf, value demonstrates that the shrinkage of a moving mass is
constant with frequency change.  There are no sudden changes in
mass/energy values.  It also explains why the energy transfer takes
place as frequency converts at right angles to that of forward motion.
Just as electromagnetic waves have greater frequency with greater speed
(thus the lines of frequency shrink), so, also, mass in the direction
of travel shrinks in proportion to greater or lesser energy values.

3. c=hf, is that for the relationship of a gravitational field with its
frequency.  It is possible that a "graviton," a single
gravitational wave, has the same frequency as all other gravitational
waves, no matter where they form, and what we consider as field of
gravity has to do with quantity and not quality.  Even though it might
be either way, at present it appears that a gravitational field is
formed of a quantity of waves (a greater multitude of waves all exactly
the same no matter where in earth they formed) and not their frequency;
although the c2=hf concept would be valid in either sense.

Dr. Einstein understood moving mass from the perspective of how it
related directly to that of energy - and it worked for him.  He arrived
at E=mc2!  But the same result is able to be found by understanding
that mass is composed of waves, and the moving mass undergoes a change
from being greater in mass in three dimensions toward that of becoming
greater in waveform in one direction and less in the other two
dimensions.

In order that the reader may understand the thinking of today
concerning the potential ramification of compounding mass, I am going
to quote a paragraph found in a book entitled "Asimov's Guide to
Science," (c) 1972; published by Basic Books Inc..  "... When
Oppenheimer worked out the properties of the neutron star in 1939, he
predicted also that it was possible for a star that was massive enough
and cool enough, to collapse altogether to nothingness.  When such
collapse proceeded past the neutron star stage, the gravitational field
would become so intense that no matter what, no light could escape from
it.  Nothing could be seen of it; it would simply be a "black hole"
in space."  To which concept I would say; Oppenheimer did not realize
that the force of gravity is a field of energy, c2=E/m, initiated by
the heat energy within a mass.  No heat - no energy.

Black holes today are an excuse to explain why so much mass is missing
from creation - 90%.  The galaxies have been stretched out, and there
is not enough mass in empty space to account for distances outward and
their being so far apart from each other.  But, that condition is not
really new news.  In the book of Isaiah 45:12 God said 3500 years ago
that the heavens had been stretched out.  "I have made the earth, and
created man upon it, I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens,
and all their host have I commanded."  So, then, it is not "black
holes" that mankind needs to find, but God.

The conclusion is this.  Because moving mass has increased frequency
change in direction of movement till it reaches the speed of light, and
at that time it then converts into radiation, there is no manner by
which a black hole is able to form under any condition.  There is no
manner whereby the mass in question may be anything other than the
original mass converted into what it already, intrinsically, was.  This
means if it is impossible for a black hole to form, then it is just as
impossible for the "big bang" to have happened.  Neither of these
events ever did exist nor shall they.  They both soon shall disappear
with a "little poof" into an obscure page somewhere in antiquity.
Duane Ertle

73602 6th Ave.
South Haven, Mich.